Architecting a Smarter Path to FIPS
140-3 Validation
By 10Pearls editorial team
A global team of technologists, strategists, and creatives dedicated to delivering the forefront of innovation. Stay informed with our latest updates and trends in artificial intelligence, advanced technology, healthcare, fintech, and beyond. Discover insightful perspectives that shape the future of industries worldwide.
FIPS 140-3 validation is critical for US and Canadian federal contractors, agencies, and businesses who leverage cryptography to protect sensitive data. For other businesses, it’s one of the strongest endorsements for data security posture.
Validating cryptographic modules for FIPS 140-3 is one of the primary services Corsec Security provides to a wide range of organizations. Corsec’s CEO, Matthew Appler, recently joined 10Pearls’ EVP, Peter Hesse, for a webinar on the topic of FIPS 140-3 validation.
The two discussed the importance and benefits of developing validation-ready systems instead of retrofitting existing systems for validation and how combining certification consulting with agile development can be a powerful and rapid approach to validation-ready systems.
Why the right architecture matters
FIPS 140-3 validation applies to the cryptographic modules within a system—not the whole thing. However, many organizations find it difficult to isolate the cryptographic boundaries of these modules from the system so that it’s independently testable, modifiable, and maintainable. This results in inefficient code rewrites and design changes that may disrupt the system.
Key architectural considerations include:
- Centralizing cryptographic functions
- Ensuring testability of algorithms and key modules
- Avoiding hardcoded or outdated algorithm implementations
- Planning for algorithm evolution, such as post-quantum cryptography
This is where Corsec’s early-stage assessments help identify gaps—and where partners like 10Pearls provide the development expertise to implement recommended changes quickly and effectively.
Embedding validation into the roadmap
Ideally, systems should be designed with validation in mind and not retrofitted to meet regulatory requirements later. It enhances their long-term stability and value and eliminates the need for cryptographic overhauls.
Corsec provides clear guidance on requirements strategy, cryptographic boundary definition, and documentation, while 10Pearls implements system-level changes to align architecture with validation goals. Together, we enable clients to move forward confidently without derailing innovation.
“You don’t have to stop building features—you just need a smarter, more modular strategy that supports both compliance and agility.”
Peter Hesse
Managing performance without compromising compliance
Performance issues are one of the primary concerns of organizations delaying FIPS 140-3 validation. Startup tests, memory constraints, and algorithm overhead can introduce friction—especially in lightweight or resource-constrained environments.
Effective strategies include:
- Using FIPS mode toggles to balance runtime needs
- Validating subcomponents, not entire systems
- Benchmarking early and often across FIPS-compatible environments
- Leveraging validated cryptographic libraries
Corsec helps clients identify the best regulatory and technical pathways to validation, and 10Pearls ensures that those pathways are optimized for performance efficiency.
CI/CD pipelines built for compliance
FIPS 140-3 doesn’t have to slow down your release cycles—if your CI/CD workflows are structured to support it. Separating feature delivery from validation-focused release tracks helps prevent unnecessary rework and keeps product updates moving.
Locking validated modules to specific versions and automating dependency checks ensures changes to the cryptographic boundary are identified early. With the right structure, teams can maintain validation while continuing to deliver at speed.
Validation vs. compliance—and why the distinction matters
As Matthew Appler explained, the term “FIPS compliant” is often misunderstood. True FIPS 140 validation involves strict documentation, third-party lab testing, and a formal government review process. Corsec guides clients through that process and helps to decode vague customer requirements and select the most efficient and effective path to validation.
10Pearls complements this by supporting the necessary engineering adjustments—so compliance aspirations turn into validation outcomes.
Corsec & 10Pearls – A strategic partnership
FIPS 140-3 validation can be demanding and highly complex, especially if the encryption modules weren’t strategically designed. This validation goes beyond a technical audit and requires a deep understanding of digital infrastructure. This is where 10Pearls comes in – an experienced technology partner with extensive experience in digital architecture and modernization. This partnership allows Corsec to offer not just gap analysis but the technical capabilities to address them.
Corsec brings:
- 500+ completed certificates
- Over one million certification consulting hours
- Time-tested strategies for taking organizations from evaluation to validation
- Strong relationships with accredited labs and federal agencies
10Pearls brings:
- Technical capabilities to modernize encryption modules as per validation requirements
- Cybersecurity expertise and DevSecOps experience
- A compliance and security-first approach to development and modernization
Together, Corsec and 10Pearls can help you identify and navigate the best path to FIPS 140-3 validation. Let’s discuss how we can help your organization with this certification.
Related articles
AI/ML
Understanding the uses of AI in energy sector
This blog explores how AI is transforming the energy sector, the opportunities it offers in various energy domains, and what it takes to run AI on energy data.
AI
Integrating AI with Legacy Systems: Enterprise Guide
Four in five enterprises are struggling to connect AI to the systems they already run. Four proven strategies for bridging that gap without ripping anything out.
AI/ML
Agentic AI in the Telecom Industry
The telecom industry is embracing agentic AI for multiple operational and customer-facing use cases, while navigating legacy systems, integration, and governance challenges.
AI/ML
AI Adoption Challenges and How Enterprises Can Solve Them
Explore the key enterprise AI adoption challenges businesses face, from data and governance to talent and strategy, and discover practical ways to scale AI beyond pilots and drive lasting business value.
AI/ML
Generative AI implementation roadmap for enterprise
Learn how to build a generative AI strategy that aligns investment with business priorities, reduces implementation risk, and creates a path from early pilots to scalable value.
AI/ML
How AI Fraud Detection Works and Where It Still Fails
How AI fraud detection works in real time, which use cases scale first, and where models still fail against AI-powered fraud.
AI/ML
Building Compliant System with Automated Regulatory
Regulatory reporting is high-stakes and error-prone. Learn how to automate reporting and build compliance into every step of the process.
AI/ML
Build and Scale Production ML Pipelines with Databricks MLflow
Building ML pipelines with MLFlow in Databricks can give enterprises already invested in the platform a more governed, repeatable path across the ML lifecycle.
AI/ML
AI in Hospitals: Scaling Pilots to Production
Learn why most hospital AI pilots stall before production, which high-ROI use cases scale first, and how the Define, Integrate, Embed, Operate model closes the gap.
AI/ML
Shadow AI detection and prevention in enterprises
Enterprises today are facing unique AI-related challenges, including shadow AI use. It's imperative that enterprises understand what it is and how to detect and govern it.
